Problems
1. Financials
- Not growing fast enough
- Translating and enabling systems, guides - radical rewrites & design?
- Packaging (manufacturing)
- Testing on computers and operating systems in the different areas
1. Outsource
2. Manage in-house
3. Leave it to re-sellers & distributors to create localized versions and handle the manufacturing for each national market (done so currently in Japan, but means most of the sales rev is going to Japanese re-sellers, deals with non US manufacturers bundling versions could also bring in more money and reach new
customers)
4. Single division responsible for all language & manufacturing or should it be farmed out to each national office - problem with multiple divisions - quality control, marketing, message management e.g. product name translated differently in each country
Solution - have a European headquarter, but where?
1. Ireland
2. Israel
3. India
As a group in class we began to brainstorm on the different dimensions that may effect our chosen country.
Country
|
Ireland
|
India
|
Israel
|
Dimension
|
|
|
|
Digital
|
|
|
|
Proximity to market
|
|
|
|
Multi Lingual
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
Education/skills
|
|
|
|
Stability (Political)
|
|
|
|
Corruption
|
|
|
|
Work Ethic
|
|
|
|
Time zone
|
|
|
|
Distance (FTS)
|
|
|
|
Legal/regulation
|
|
|
|
Cost ( HR etc)
|
3K
|
250
|
?
|
Culture
|
|
|
|
Past History
|
|
|
|
Reputation
|
|
|
|
Macro Econ (local)
|
|
|
|
Climate
|
|
|
|
Labour Market
|
10K
Graduates per yr
|
500K
|
10K
|
In the end 18 people voted for India, 11 for Ireland (including myself), and 0 for Israel. Ireland seemed like a logical choice mainly because of its location. This would mean cutting down on transport costs, avoiding currency exchanges, and benefiting from being apart of the EU, e.g. in terms of free movement of goods and labour, favorable laws and regulations etc.
From researching Symantec's current situation with outsourcing it seems they choose Ireland as their outsourcing location. Today it remains the main manufacturing headquarters in Europe, but they have chosen to set up other functions such as R&D and customer support across a variety of countries throughout the EU and and Southeast Asia. This has allowed the company to mix and match the different benefits available to them across a range of countries.
A.T Kearney's Global Index was a good starting point in helping us determine dimensions for the Symantec case, but we also identified some downsides of the consultant companies research paper. These are highlighted in the table below.
Good
|
Use it?
Trust?
Reference?
|
Bad
|
Factual
|
Useful at a
city level
|
Out dated
|
Article
generates o/o
|
|
Model
transparency
|
Good
Methodology
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment